Skip to content

Q2 FY24 Earnings Results

Q2 FY24 earnings, Jul–Sep 2023: 5,345 Indian listed companies have reported; median profit growth is 0.0% on last year. Quarter ended 30 Sep 2023.

#CompanyRevenue (₹ Cr)SectorRevenue (₹ Cr)Profit (₹ Cr)
🥇 RELIANCE Reliance Industries Ltd2,31,886Petroleum Products2,31,88619,878
🥈 LICI Life Insurance Corporation of India2,03,033Insurance2,03,0338,032
🥉 IOC Indian Oil Corporation Ltd1,79,246Petroleum Products1,79,24613,713
4 ONGC Oil & Natural Gas Corpn Ltd1,47,614Oil & Gas1,47,61416,171
5 TMPV Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles Ltd1,05,129Automobiles1,05,1293,832
6 BPCL Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd1,03,044Petroleum Products1,03,0448,244
7 HINDPETRO Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd95,752Petroleum Products95,7525,827
8 Apeejay Tea Ltd (Merged) 59,692—59,69211,380
9 TCS Tata Consultancy Services Ltd59,692Information Technology59,69211,380
10 TATASTEEL Tata Steel Ltd55,682Metals & Mining55,682−6,511
11 HINDALCO Hindalco Industries Ltd54,169Metals & Mining54,1692,196
12 LT Larsen & Toubro Ltd51,024Industrials51,0243,846
13 NTPC NTPC Ltd44,983Power44,9834,726
14 JSWSTEEL JSW Steel Ltd44,584Commodities44,5842,773
15 INFY Infosys Ltd38,994Information Technology38,9946,215
16 VEDL Vedanta Ltd38,945Metals & Mining38,945−915
17 RAJESHEXPO Rajesh Exports Ltd38,066Consumer Goods38,06645
18 MARUTI Maruti Suzuki India Ltd37,339Consumer Discretionary37,3393,786
19 Vishwakarma Cements Ltd 37,044—37,0442,093
20 BHARTIARTL Bharti Airtel Ltd37,044Telecom37,0442,093
21 M&M Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd34,436Automobiles34,4362,484
22 Mardia Extrusions Ltd 32,986—32,9862,442
23 GAIL GAIL (India) Ltd32,986Energy32,9862,442
24 COALINDIA Coal India Ltd32,776Energy32,7768,049
25 GRASIM Grasim Industries Ltd30,221Construction30,2212,024

About the Q2 FY24 leaderboard

What does the Q2 FY24 earnings leaderboard rank?
Companies ranked on one measure at a time — EPS surprise against consensus, profit growth, revenue growth, or absolute profit and revenue. Ranking is computed over every company that reported the quarter, not just the ones on the first page of the grid.
Which companies can appear in the EPS surprise ranking?
Surprise is measured against an analyst estimate, and none was available for this quarter.
Is a large percentage growth figure always a good result?
No. A company recovering from a very small base can post several hundred percent growth on a modest absolute gain, which is why absolute revenue and profit are shown beside the growth figure. Growth measured from a loss-making base is excluded entirely rather than published as a large number.
Why do some Q2 FY24 growth figures show "n/a" instead of a percentage?
Growth is left blank whenever the comparison period was not profitable. A percentage change measured from a loss is arithmetic without meaning — a swing from a ₹10 crore loss to a ₹10 crore profit is not "200% growth", and publishing it as such would flatter the company. The reported figures for both periods are still shown, so the change is there to read directly.
Does the beat/miss verdict cover every company?
No analyst consensus was available for Q2 FY24, so no beat/miss verdict is shown. Revenue and profit growth are taken from reported results and cover every company in the table.
What counts as an in-line result rather than a beat or a miss?
Reported earnings per share within ±2% of the consensus estimate. The band is set there because a tighter one classifies rounding as news, and a wider one swallows surprises that genuinely moved a stock.
Are the figures consolidated or standalone?
Consolidated where a company reports on that basis, standalone otherwise, with all money in ₹ crore. Figures are as filed by the company with the exchanges (NSE/BSE); they are not restated or adjusted.

Figures are as reported by companies in their quarterly filings to the exchanges (NSE/BSE), in ₹ crore. Consolidated results are shown where a company reports them, otherwise standalone. Year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter growth is omitted where the comparison period was loss-making, since a percentage change from a negative base is not meaningful. Analyst consensus is an estimate, not a forecast of outcome.