Q1 FY24 Earnings Results
Q1 FY24 earnings, Apr–Jun 2023: 4,564 Indian listed companies have reported; median profit growth is −37.3% on last year. Quarter ended 30 Jun 2023.
Ranked on reported EPS against analyst consensus, highest surprise first. Only the 0 of 4,564 reporters an analyst forecast this quarter have a surprise at all; the rest rank below them.
| # | Company | EPS surprise | Sector | Revenue (₹ Cr) | Profit (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | — | Metals & Mining | 191 | 15 | |
| 🥈 | — | Capital Markets | 1 | −3 | |
| 🥉 | — | Information Technology | 194 | −16 | |
| 4 | — | Diversified | 977 | 117 | |
| 5 | — | — | 0 | 0 | |
| 6 | — | Healthcare | 2 | −2 | |
| 7 | — | Chemicals | 191 | 1 | |
| 8 | — | Metals & Mining | 32 | 0 | |
| 9 | — | Leisure Services | 3 | −1 | |
| 10 | — | Capital Goods | 14 | 2 | |
| 11 | — | Metals & Mining | 48 | 1 | |
| 12 | — | Capital Goods | 88 | 15 | |
| 13 | — | Capital Markets | 1 | 1 | |
| 14 | — | Chemicals | 173 | 35 | |
| 15 | — | Financial Services | — | 0 | |
| 16 | — | Financial Services | 44 | 3 | |
| 17 | — | Capital Goods | 221 | 4 | |
| 18 | — | Commercial Services | 47 | 2 | |
| 19 | — | Consumer Goods | 166 | −2 | |
| 20 | — | Textiles | 50 | −2 | |
| 21 | — | Textiles | 3 | −2 | |
| 22 | — | Financial Services | — | 0 | |
| 23 | — | Financial Services | — | 0 | |
| 24 | — | Textiles | 56 | 7 | |
| 25 | — | Services | 0 | 0 |
About the Q1 FY24 leaderboard
What does the Q1 FY24 earnings leaderboard rank?
Which companies can appear in the EPS surprise ranking?
Is a large percentage growth figure always a good result?
Why do some Q1 FY24 growth figures show "n/a" instead of a percentage?
Does the beat/miss verdict cover every company?
What counts as an in-line result rather than a beat or a miss?
Are the figures consolidated or standalone?
Figures are as reported by companies in their quarterly filings to the exchanges (NSE/BSE), in ₹ crore. Consolidated results are shown where a company reports them, otherwise standalone. Year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter growth is omitted where the comparison period was loss-making, since a percentage change from a negative base is not meaningful. Analyst consensus is an estimate, not a forecast of outcome.