Q3 FY24 Earnings
Quarterly results for Indian listed companies · Oct–Dec 2023 · quarter ended 31 Dec 2023
Reported
4,770
companies
Profit breadth
53% / 45%
grew / declined · 264 comparable
Median sales YoY
+4.9%
across all reporters
Median profit YoY
+3.8%
across all reporters
Beat / missed
0 / 0
of 0 covered
Strongest / weakest
Retail +70.6%
Chemicals -1,075.2%
median profit growth, 10+ reporters
| # | Company | Revenue (₹ Cr) | Sector | Revenue (₹ Cr) | Profit (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | 2.25 L Cr | Petroleum Products | 2.25 L Cr | 19,641 | |
| 🥈 | 2.14 L Cr | Insurance | 2.14 L Cr | 9,434 | |
| 🥉 | 2 L Cr | Petroleum Products | 2 L Cr | 9,225 | |
| 4 | 1.67 L Cr | Oil & Gas | 1.67 L Cr | 10,511 | |
| 5 | 1.15 L Cr | Petroleum Products | 1.15 L Cr | 3,181 | |
| 6 | 1.11 L Cr | Petroleum Products | 1.11 L Cr | 713 | |
| 7 | 1.11 L Cr | Consumer Discretionary | 1.11 L Cr | 7,145 | |
| 8 | 65,477 | Consumer Goods | 65,477 | 12 | |
| 9 | — Apeejay Tea Ltd (Merged) | 60,583 | — | 60,583 | 11,097 |
| 10 | 60,583 | Information Technology | 60,583 | 11,097 | |
| 11 | 55,312 | Commodities | 55,312 | 522 | |
| 12 | 55,128 | Construction | 55,128 | 3,593 | |
| 13 | 52,808 | Metals & Mining | 52,808 | 2,331 | |
| 14 | 42,820 | Power | 42,820 | 5,209 | |
| 15 | 41,940 | Metals & Mining | 41,940 | 2,450 | |
| 16 | 39,033 | Financial Services | 39,033 | 322 | |
| 17 | 38,821 | Information Technology | 38,821 | 6,113 | |
| 18 | — Vishwakarma Cements Ltd | 37,900 | — | 37,900 | 2,876 |
| 19 | 37,900 | Telecom | 37,900 | 2,876 | |
| 20 | 36,154 | Energy | 36,154 | 10,292 | |
| 21 | 35,541 | Commodities | 35,541 | 2,868 | |
| 22 | 35,299 | Automobiles | 35,299 | 2,977 | |
| 23 | — Mardia Extrusions Ltd | 34,698 | — | 34,698 | 3,193 |
| 24 | 34,698 | Energy | 34,698 | 3,193 | |
| 25 | 33,513 | Automobiles | 33,513 | 3,207 |
About the Q3 FY24 leaderboard
What does the Q3 FY24 earnings leaderboard rank?
Companies ranked on one measure at a time — EPS surprise against consensus, profit growth, revenue growth, or absolute profit and revenue. Ranking is computed over every company that reported the quarter, not just the ones on the first page of the grid.
Which companies can appear in the EPS surprise ranking?
Surprise is measured against an analyst estimate, and none was available for this quarter.
Is a large percentage growth figure always a good result?
No. A company recovering from a very small base can post several hundred percent growth on a modest absolute gain, which is why absolute revenue and profit are shown beside the growth figure. Growth measured from a loss-making base is excluded entirely rather than published as a large number.
Why do some Q3 FY24 growth figures show "n/a" instead of a percentage?
Growth is left blank whenever the comparison period was not profitable. A percentage change measured from a loss is arithmetic without meaning — a swing from a ₹10 crore loss to a ₹10 crore profit is not "200% growth", and publishing it as such would flatter the company. The reported figures for both periods are still shown, so the change is there to read directly.
Does the beat/miss verdict cover every company?
No analyst consensus was available for Q3 FY24, so no beat/miss verdict is shown. Revenue and profit growth are taken from reported results and cover every company in the table.
What counts as an in-line result rather than a beat or a miss?
Reported earnings per share within ±2% of the consensus estimate. The band is set there because a tighter one classifies rounding as news, and a wider one swallows surprises that genuinely moved a stock.
Are the figures consolidated or standalone?
Consolidated where a company reports on that basis, standalone otherwise, with all money in ₹ crore. Figures are as filed by the company with the exchanges (NSE/BSE); they are not restated or adjusted.
Figures are as reported by companies in their quarterly filings to the exchanges (NSE/BSE), in ₹ crore. Consolidated results are shown where a company reports them, otherwise standalone. Year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter growth is omitted where the comparison period was loss-making, since a percentage change from a negative base is not meaningful. Analyst consensus is an estimate, not a forecast of outcome.