Skip to content

Q3 FY25 Earnings Results

Q3 FY25 earnings, Oct–Dec 2024: 5,037 Indian listed companies have reported; median profit growth is 0.0% on last year. Quarter ended 31 Dec 2024.

#CompanyRevenue (₹ Cr)SectorRevenue (₹ Cr)Profit (₹ Cr)
🥇 RELIANCE Reliance Industries Ltd2,39,986Petroleum Products2,39,98621,930
🥈 LICI Life Insurance Corporation of India2,03,751Insurance2,03,75111,009
🥉 IOC Indian Oil Corporation Ltd1,94,014Petroleum Products1,94,0142,147
4 ONGC Oil & Natural Gas Corpn Ltd1,67,213Oil & Gas1,67,2139,747
5 BPCL Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd1,13,166Petroleum Products1,13,1663,806
6 HINDPETRO Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd1,10,608Petroleum Products1,10,6082,544
7 RAJESHEXPO Rajesh Exports Ltd96,630Consumer Goods96,63036
8 TMPV Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles Ltd94,472Automobiles94,4725,484
9 LT Larsen & Toubro Ltd64,668Industrials64,6683,974
10 Apeejay Tea Ltd (Merged) 63,973—63,97312,444
11 TCS Tata Consultancy Services Ltd63,973Information Technology63,97312,444
12 HINDALCO Hindalco Industries Ltd58,390Metals & Mining58,3903,735
13 TATASTEEL Tata Steel Ltd53,648Metals & Mining53,648295
14 Vishwakarma Cements Ltd 45,129—45,12916,135
15 BHARTIARTL Bharti Airtel Ltd45,129Telecom45,12916,135
16 NTPC NTPC Ltd45,069Power45,0695,170
17 INFY Infosys Ltd41,764Information Technology41,7646,822
18 M&M Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd41,470Automobiles41,4703,624
19 JSWSTEEL JSW Steel Ltd41,378Commodities41,378719
20 MARUTI Maruti Suzuki India Ltd38,764Consumer Discretionary38,7643,727
21 COALINDIA Coal India Ltd36,859Energy36,8598,491
22 Mardia Extrusions Ltd 36,835—36,8354,084
23 GAIL GAIL (India) Ltd36,835Energy36,8354,084
24 GRASIM Grasim Industries Ltd35,378Construction35,3781,734
25 BAJAJFINSV Bajaj Finserv Ltd32,042Financial Services32,0424,412

About the Q3 FY25 leaderboard

What does the Q3 FY25 earnings leaderboard rank?
Companies ranked on one measure at a time — EPS surprise against consensus, profit growth, revenue growth, or absolute profit and revenue. Ranking is computed over every company that reported the quarter, not just the ones on the first page of the grid.
Which companies can appear in the EPS surprise ranking?
Surprise is measured against an analyst estimate, and none was available for this quarter.
Is a large percentage growth figure always a good result?
No. A company recovering from a very small base can post several hundred percent growth on a modest absolute gain, which is why absolute revenue and profit are shown beside the growth figure. Growth measured from a loss-making base is excluded entirely rather than published as a large number.
Why do some Q3 FY25 growth figures show "n/a" instead of a percentage?
Growth is left blank whenever the comparison period was not profitable. A percentage change measured from a loss is arithmetic without meaning — a swing from a ₹10 crore loss to a ₹10 crore profit is not "200% growth", and publishing it as such would flatter the company. The reported figures for both periods are still shown, so the change is there to read directly.
Does the beat/miss verdict cover every company?
No analyst consensus was available for Q3 FY25, so no beat/miss verdict is shown. Revenue and profit growth are taken from reported results and cover every company in the table.
What counts as an in-line result rather than a beat or a miss?
Reported earnings per share within ±2% of the consensus estimate. The band is set there because a tighter one classifies rounding as news, and a wider one swallows surprises that genuinely moved a stock.
Are the figures consolidated or standalone?
Consolidated where a company reports on that basis, standalone otherwise, with all money in ₹ crore. Figures are as filed by the company with the exchanges (NSE/BSE); they are not restated or adjusted.

Figures are as reported by companies in their quarterly filings to the exchanges (NSE/BSE), in ₹ crore. Consolidated results are shown where a company reports them, otherwise standalone. Year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter growth is omitted where the comparison period was loss-making, since a percentage change from a negative base is not meaningful. Analyst consensus is an estimate, not a forecast of outcome.