Skip to content

Q2 FY25 Earnings Results

Q2 FY25 earnings, Jul–Sep 2024: 5,887 Indian listed companies have reported; median profit growth is +6.2% on last year. Quarter ended 30 Sep 2024.

#CompanyRevenue (₹ Cr)SectorRevenue (₹ Cr)Profit (₹ Cr)
🥇 RELIANCE Reliance Industries Ltd2,31,535Petroleum Products2,31,53519,323
🥈 LICI Life Insurance Corporation of India2,31,132Insurance2,31,1327,723
🥉 IOC Indian Oil Corporation Ltd1,74,976Petroleum Products1,74,976−449
4 ONGC Oil & Natural Gas Corpn Ltd1,59,331Oil & Gas1,59,3319,841
5 BPCL Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd1,02,785Petroleum Products1,02,7852,297
6 HINDPETRO Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd99,957Petroleum Products99,957143
7 TMPV Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles Ltd83,656Automobiles83,6563,521
8 RAJESHEXPO Rajesh Exports Ltd66,924Consumer Goods66,92446
9 Apeejay Tea Ltd (Merged) 64,259—64,25911,955
10 TCS Tata Consultancy Services Ltd64,259Information Technology64,25911,955
11 LT Larsen & Toubro Ltd61,555Industrials61,5554,099
12 HINDALCO Hindalco Industries Ltd58,203Metals & Mining58,2033,909
13 TATASTEEL Tata Steel Ltd53,905Metals & Mining53,905759
14 NTPC NTPC Ltd44,706Power44,7065,380
15 Vishwakarma Cements Ltd 41,473—41,4734,153
16 BHARTIARTL Bharti Airtel Ltd41,473Telecom41,4734,153
17 INFY Infosys Ltd40,986Information Technology40,9866,516
18 SBILIFE SBI Life Insurance Company Ltd40,302Insurance40,302529
19 JSWSTEEL JSW Steel Ltd39,684Commodities39,684404
20 M&M Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd37,924Automobiles37,9243,361
21 VEDL Vedanta Ltd37,634Metals & Mining37,6345,603
22 MARUTI Maruti Suzuki India Ltd37,449Consumer Discretionary37,4493,102
23 GRASIM Grasim Industries Ltd34,223Construction34,223983
24 Mardia Extrusions Ltd 33,889—33,8892,690
25 GAIL GAIL (India) Ltd33,889Energy33,8892,690

About the Q2 FY25 leaderboard

What does the Q2 FY25 earnings leaderboard rank?
Companies ranked on one measure at a time — EPS surprise against consensus, profit growth, revenue growth, or absolute profit and revenue. Ranking is computed over every company that reported the quarter, not just the ones on the first page of the grid.
Which companies can appear in the EPS surprise ranking?
Surprise is measured against an analyst estimate, and none was available for this quarter.
Is a large percentage growth figure always a good result?
No. A company recovering from a very small base can post several hundred percent growth on a modest absolute gain, which is why absolute revenue and profit are shown beside the growth figure. Growth measured from a loss-making base is excluded entirely rather than published as a large number.
Why do some Q2 FY25 growth figures show "n/a" instead of a percentage?
Growth is left blank whenever the comparison period was not profitable. A percentage change measured from a loss is arithmetic without meaning — a swing from a ₹10 crore loss to a ₹10 crore profit is not "200% growth", and publishing it as such would flatter the company. The reported figures for both periods are still shown, so the change is there to read directly.
Does the beat/miss verdict cover every company?
No analyst consensus was available for Q2 FY25, so no beat/miss verdict is shown. Revenue and profit growth are taken from reported results and cover every company in the table.
What counts as an in-line result rather than a beat or a miss?
Reported earnings per share within ±2% of the consensus estimate. The band is set there because a tighter one classifies rounding as news, and a wider one swallows surprises that genuinely moved a stock.
Are the figures consolidated or standalone?
Consolidated where a company reports on that basis, standalone otherwise, with all money in ₹ crore. Figures are as filed by the company with the exchanges (NSE/BSE); they are not restated or adjusted.

Figures are as reported by companies in their quarterly filings to the exchanges (NSE/BSE), in ₹ crore. Consolidated results are shown where a company reports them, otherwise standalone. Year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter growth is omitted where the comparison period was loss-making, since a percentage change from a negative base is not meaningful. Analyst consensus is an estimate, not a forecast of outcome.