Q2 FY25 Earnings Results
Q2 FY25 earnings, Jul–Sep 2024: 5,887 Indian listed companies have reported; median profit growth is +6.2% on last year. Quarter ended 30 Sep 2024.
Ranked on reported EPS against analyst consensus, highest surprise first. Only the 0 of 5,887 reporters an analyst forecast this quarter have a surprise at all; the rest rank below them.
| # | Company | EPS surprise | Sector | Revenue (₹ Cr) | Profit (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | — | Metals & Mining | 240 | 16 | |
| 🥈 | — | Capital Markets | 14 | 2 | |
| 🥉 | — | Capital Markets | 865 | 245 | |
| 4 | — | Information Technology | 178 | −10 | |
| 5 | — | Diversified | 1,111 | 134 | |
| 6 | — | Financial Services | 2 | 1 | |
| 7 | — | — | 0 | 0 | |
| 8 | — | Healthcare | 0 | 4 | |
| 9 | — | Chemicals | 104 | −4 | |
| 10 | — | Metals & Mining | 23 | 1 | |
| 11 | — | Leisure Services | 6 | 0 | |
| 12 | — | Capital Goods | 17 | 2 | |
| 13 | — | Metals & Mining | 64 | 1 | |
| 14 | — | Capital Goods | 85 | 12 | |
| 15 | — | Capital Markets | 2 | 1 | |
| 16 | — | Chemicals | 184 | 31 | |
| 17 | Elgi Industrial Products Ltd (Merged) | — | — | 41 | 3 |
| 18 | — | Financial Services | — | 0 | |
| 19 | — | Financial Services | 30 | 11 | |
| 20 | — | Capital Goods | 76 | −8 | |
| 21 | — | Commercial Services | 69 | 4 | |
| 22 | — | Consumer Goods | 316 | 60 | |
| 23 | — | Textiles | 44 | −1 | |
| 24 | — | Textiles | 0 | −3 | |
| 25 | — | Financial Services | — | 0 |
About the Q2 FY25 leaderboard
What does the Q2 FY25 earnings leaderboard rank?
Which companies can appear in the EPS surprise ranking?
Is a large percentage growth figure always a good result?
Why do some Q2 FY25 growth figures show "n/a" instead of a percentage?
Does the beat/miss verdict cover every company?
What counts as an in-line result rather than a beat or a miss?
Are the figures consolidated or standalone?
Figures are as reported by companies in their quarterly filings to the exchanges (NSE/BSE), in ₹ crore. Consolidated results are shown where a company reports them, otherwise standalone. Year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter growth is omitted where the comparison period was loss-making, since a percentage change from a negative base is not meaningful. Analyst consensus is an estimate, not a forecast of outcome.