Skip to content

Q1 FY26 Earnings Results

Q1 FY26 earnings, Apr–Jun 2025: 5,166 Indian listed companies have reported; median profit growth is +4.8% on last year, and 0 of 1 companies with analyst estimates beat them. Quarter ended 30 Jun 2025.

Strongest Insurance +28.8%

Weakest Capital Markets −18.4%

Most reporters Financial Services 589

median profit growth · strongest and weakest consider sectors with 10+ reporters

SectorReportedMedian sales YoYMedian profit YoYBeat / missed / in line
Financial Services589+4.9%+4.4%no analyst coverage
Industrial Products350+6.8%+3.0%no analyst coverage
Commercial Services335+6.2%−6.6%no analyst coverage
Consumer Goods304+3.4%0.0%no analyst coverage
Textiles281+0.5%+4.9%
0 / 1 / 0 of 1 covered
Chemicals275+7.5%+6.3%no analyst coverage
Information Technology262+9.1%+11.1%no analyst coverage
Healthcare234+9.2%+9.9%no analyst coverage
Capital Goods227+10.0%+10.1%no analyst coverage
Automobiles177+8.2%+15.4%no analyst coverage
Construction176+9.0%+26.2%no analyst coverage
Realty157+11.9%+4.0%no analyst coverage
Consumer Discretionary155+2.4%−13.4%no analyst coverage
Industrials1150.0%+11.3%no analyst coverage
Leisure Services95+8.1%+1.9%no analyst coverage
Food Products95+10.7%+0.6%no analyst coverage
Media94+1.9%+7.4%no analyst coverage
FMCG91+14.7%+2.4%no analyst coverage
Metals & Mining85+3.5%+1.1%no analyst coverage
Services78+6.9%+9.0%no analyst coverage
Commodities71+9.3%+25.0%no analyst coverage
Capital Markets61−5.1%−18.4%no analyst coverage
Retail56+12.4%+13.1%no analyst coverage
Logistics & Cargo55+7.4%+9.1%no analyst coverage
Healthcare Services55+15.0%+12.2%no analyst coverage
Forest Materials52+2.5%−7.1%no analyst coverage
Fast Moving Consumer Goods46+6.9%−9.3%no analyst coverage
Banks39—+2.4%no analyst coverage
Power39+7.0%+5.1%no analyst coverage
Telecom37+0.9%−4.9%no analyst coverage
Consumer Services30+10.0%−8.3%no analyst coverage
Oil & Gas28+10.2%+11.5%no analyst coverage
Aerospace & Defense25+11.4%+13.0%no analyst coverage
Beverages22+6.0%+5.0%no analyst coverage
Utilities22+9.8%+8.2%no analyst coverage
Diversified17+6.6%+6.3%no analyst coverage
Petroleum Products16−0.6%+7.7%no analyst coverage
Insurance13+12.5%+28.8%no analyst coverage
Transport13+5.2%−5.0%no analyst coverage
Energy12+1.6%−15.7%no analyst coverage
Transport Services11−13.1%−9.6%no analyst coverage
Telecommunication6+43.1%−200.0%no analyst coverage
Aviation4−3.9%−20.3%no analyst coverage
Engineering Services2+35.9%+10.0%no analyst coverage
Castings, Forgings & Fastners2+1.1%−122.9%no analyst coverage
Trading2+45.0%+8.0%no analyst coverage
Steel1−5.6%−28.3%no analyst coverage
Capital Goods - Electrical Equipment1+21.9%+1.3%no analyst coverage
Printing & Stationery1+5.1%−12.4%no analyst coverage
Packaging1+4.9%+1.7%no analyst coverage
Education1+4.2%−25.3%no analyst coverage
Consumer Durables1——no analyst coverage
Diamond, Gems and Jewellery1+80.8%+3.8%no analyst coverage
Cables1+35.7%−11.8%no analyst coverage

About Q1 FY26 sector data

Which sectors performed best in Q1 FY26?
On median profit growth, Insurance led and Capital Markets lagged among sectors with at least ten companies reporting. The table below ranks every sector on median revenue and profit growth alongside its beat/miss split.
Why the median and not the average?
A single company swinging from a small loss to a small profit can produce a four-figure growth percentage, and an average would let that one row define the whole sector. The median describes the typical company in the group, which is the question a sector view is actually asked.
Why do sectors with few companies get excluded from the strongest and weakest?
A sector where three companies reported has a median that can move on one result. The strongest and weakest labels only consider sectors with ten or more reporters, so the ranking reflects a trend rather than an accident.
Why do some Q1 FY26 growth figures show "n/a" instead of a percentage?
Growth is left blank whenever the comparison period was not profitable. A percentage change measured from a loss is arithmetic without meaning — a swing from a ₹10 crore loss to a ₹10 crore profit is not "200% growth", and publishing it as such would flatter the company. The reported figures for both periods are still shown, so the change is there to read directly.
Does the beat/miss verdict cover every company?
No, and the denominator matters. An analyst consensus existed for 1 of the 5,166 companies that reported Q1 FY26 — 0.0%. Beat, missed and in-line describe only those. Every other company is marked "no estimate" rather than being counted as in line, because nobody forecast it. Revenue and profit growth, by contrast, cover every company in the table.
What counts as an in-line result rather than a beat or a miss?
Reported earnings per share within ±2% of the consensus estimate. The band is set there because a tighter one classifies rounding as news, and a wider one swallows surprises that genuinely moved a stock.
Are the figures consolidated or standalone?
Consolidated where a company reports on that basis, standalone otherwise, with all money in ₹ crore. Figures are as filed by the company with the exchanges (NSE/BSE); they are not restated or adjusted.

Figures are as reported by companies in their quarterly filings to the exchanges (NSE/BSE), in ₹ crore. Consolidated results are shown where a company reports them, otherwise standalone. Year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter growth is omitted where the comparison period was loss-making, since a percentage change from a negative base is not meaningful. Analyst consensus is an estimate, not a forecast of outcome.