Skip to content

Q4 FY25 Earnings Results

Q4 FY25 earnings, Jan–Mar 2025: 6,076 Indian listed companies have reported; median profit growth is −0.4% on last year. Quarter ended 31 Mar 2025.

Strongest Aerospace & Defense +26.2%

Weakest Transport Services −59.6%

Most reporters Financial Services 609

median profit growth · strongest and weakest consider sectors with 10+ reporters

SectorReportedMedian sales YoYMedian profit YoYBeat / missed / in line
Financial Services609−13.5%−33.3%no analyst coverage
Industrial Products465+10.0%+3.1%no analyst coverage
Commercial Services398+5.6%−28.6%no analyst coverage
Consumer Goods368+10.5%0.0%no analyst coverage
Textiles323+4.5%−0.2%no analyst coverage
Chemicals315+9.9%0.0%no analyst coverage
Information Technology312+8.8%+3.7%no analyst coverage
Capital Goods299+12.6%+7.5%no analyst coverage
Healthcare270+9.2%+4.9%no analyst coverage
Construction225+4.5%0.0%no analyst coverage
Automobiles198+8.9%+3.0%no analyst coverage
Realty1740.0%−14.5%no analyst coverage
Consumer Discretionary142+8.2%−37.3%no analyst coverage
Media122−0.1%−49.2%no analyst coverage
Food Products122+12.9%0.0%no analyst coverage
FMCG120+7.4%+7.6%no analyst coverage
Leisure Services114+7.9%+12.9%no analyst coverage
Industrials103+5.5%+14.3%no analyst coverage
Metals & Mining95+7.5%−14.5%no analyst coverage
Logistics & Cargo87+9.0%−2.0%no analyst coverage
Services78+8.3%+19.5%no analyst coverage
Retail76+12.7%+4.2%no analyst coverage
Commodities75+5.4%+5.4%no analyst coverage
Healthcare Services65+11.6%0.0%no analyst coverage
Capital Markets64−20.7%−31.3%no analyst coverage
Forest Materials60+0.2%−39.6%no analyst coverage
Fast Moving Consumer Goods49+13.9%−31.4%no analyst coverage
Power44+6.5%+13.2%no analyst coverage
Telecom43+6.1%−36.8%no analyst coverage
Consumer Services42+19.8%−1.7%no analyst coverage
Banks39—+15.4%no analyst coverage
Utilities32+21.0%+17.7%no analyst coverage
Oil & Gas30+4.9%−19.2%no analyst coverage
Aerospace & Defense28+20.0%+26.2%no analyst coverage
Beverages25+5.6%−53.0%no analyst coverage
Petroleum Products22+1.4%+6.3%no analyst coverage
Diversified20+5.4%+0.7%no analyst coverage
Transport Services16−15.3%−59.6%no analyst coverage
Insurance13+6.3%+13.7%no analyst coverage
Transport13+1.3%−16.7%no analyst coverage
Energy13+3.2%−1.8%no analyst coverage
Telecommunication6−0.9%−27.9%no analyst coverage
Aviation5−10.0%+116.7%no analyst coverage
Consumer Durables3——no analyst coverage
Media Entertainment & Publication3——no analyst coverage
Castings, Forgings & Fastners2−2.2%−32.3%no analyst coverage
Engineering Services2+40.4%+57.1%no analyst coverage
Capital Goods - Electrical Equipment2+7.4%+123.1%no analyst coverage
Trading2+18.9%−9.1%no analyst coverage
Telecomm Equipment & Infra Services1+135.2%+141.7%no analyst coverage
Cables1+149.3%−42.9%no analyst coverage
Printing & Stationery1+9.1%+10.6%no analyst coverage
Education1−14.2%−20.8%no analyst coverage
Packaging1+29.8%+53.4%no analyst coverage
Diamond, Gems and Jewellery1+1,356.3%—no analyst coverage
Steel1+25.7%−25.3%no analyst coverage

About Q4 FY25 sector data

Which sectors performed best in Q4 FY25?
On median profit growth, Aerospace & Defense led and Transport Services lagged among sectors with at least ten companies reporting. The table below ranks every sector on median revenue and profit growth alongside its beat/miss split.
Why the median and not the average?
A single company swinging from a small loss to a small profit can produce a four-figure growth percentage, and an average would let that one row define the whole sector. The median describes the typical company in the group, which is the question a sector view is actually asked.
Why do sectors with few companies get excluded from the strongest and weakest?
A sector where three companies reported has a median that can move on one result. The strongest and weakest labels only consider sectors with ten or more reporters, so the ranking reflects a trend rather than an accident.
Why do some Q4 FY25 growth figures show "n/a" instead of a percentage?
Growth is left blank whenever the comparison period was not profitable. A percentage change measured from a loss is arithmetic without meaning — a swing from a ₹10 crore loss to a ₹10 crore profit is not "200% growth", and publishing it as such would flatter the company. The reported figures for both periods are still shown, so the change is there to read directly.
Does the beat/miss verdict cover every company?
No analyst consensus was available for Q4 FY25, so no beat/miss verdict is shown. Revenue and profit growth are taken from reported results and cover every company in the table.
What counts as an in-line result rather than a beat or a miss?
Reported earnings per share within ±2% of the consensus estimate. The band is set there because a tighter one classifies rounding as news, and a wider one swallows surprises that genuinely moved a stock.
Are the figures consolidated or standalone?
Consolidated where a company reports on that basis, standalone otherwise, with all money in ₹ crore. Figures are as filed by the company with the exchanges (NSE/BSE); they are not restated or adjusted.

Figures are as reported by companies in their quarterly filings to the exchanges (NSE/BSE), in ₹ crore. Consolidated results are shown where a company reports them, otherwise standalone. Year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter growth is omitted where the comparison period was loss-making, since a percentage change from a negative base is not meaningful. Analyst consensus is an estimate, not a forecast of outcome.