Q2 FY26 Earnings

Quarterly results for Indian listed companies · Jul–Sep 2025 · quarter ended 30 Sept 2025

Strongest Transport Services +33.8%

Weakest Forest Materials -33.3%

Most reporters Financial Services 612

median profit growth · strongest and weakest consider sectors with 10+ reporters

SectorReportedMedian sales YoYMedian profit YoYBeat / missed / in line
Financial Services612+0.6%-7.1%
11 / 10 / 4 of 25 covered
Industrial Products393+8.6%+8.3%
10 / 2 / 1 of 13 covered
Commercial Services365+6.4%-6.2%
1 / 2 / 1 of 4 covered
Consumer Discretionary347+11.5%+10.6%
13 / 13 / 3 of 29 covered
Consumer Goods310+6.5%+4.6%
11 / 14 / 1 of 26 covered
Information Technology309+12.7%+13.2%
10 / 8 / 7 of 25 covered
Healthcare278+8.9%+6.4%
9 / 10 / 0 of 19 covered
Textiles270+2.5%-1.0%
2 / 1 / 0 of 3 covered
Chemicals267+8.2%0.0%
1 / 2 / 0 of 3 covered
Industrials257+10.7%+8.6%
3 / 3 / 1 of 7 covered
Capital Goods251+16.6%+13.0%
4 / 2 / 2 of 8 covered
Construction177+16.5%+12.5%
9 / 5 / 0 of 14 covered
Realty159+5.6%-14.4%
2 / 3 / 1 of 6 covered
Automobiles157+10.8%+8.6%
10 / 11 / 2 of 23 covered
Commodities143+8.8%+8.8%
2 / 5 / 1 of 8 covered
Services132+6.0%-4.0%
2 / 1 / 0 of 3 covered
Food Products108+15.3%+22.2%
4 / 2 / 0 of 6 covered
FMCG105+17.9%0.0%
1 / 3 / 0 of 4 covered
Media99+7.6%-7.0%
1 / 1 / 0 of 2 covered
Leisure Services90+7.0%-22.6%
1 / 4 / 0 of 5 covered
Fast Moving Consumer Goods90+3.5%+1.1%
2 / 1 / 1 of 4 covered
Metals & Mining86+8.2%+7.2%
1 / 3 / 1 of 5 covered
Logistics & Cargo70+11.0%-3.9%
1 / 4 / 0 of 5 covered
Retail64+14.9%+17.8%
2 / 9 / 2 of 13 covered
Capital Markets59-0.5%-12.7%
2 / 0 / 0 of 2 covered
Healthcare Services58+14.9%+15.7%
6 / 2 / 0 of 8 covered
Forest Materials53+6.3%-33.3%no analyst coverage
Power38+10.7%-1.1%
1 / 2 / 1 of 4 covered
Utilities38+15.2%+12.5%
1 / 0 / 0 of 1 covered
Consumer Services34+8.1%+4.2%
1 / 1 / 0 of 2 covered
Banks32+6.4%
8 / 2 / 1 of 11 covered
Telecom31+2.4%-25.3%
3 / 0 / 0 of 3 covered
Oil & Gas29+15.8%+8.3%
2 / 4 / 0 of 6 covered
Aerospace & Defense24+16.4%+22.9%
4 / 1 / 0 of 5 covered
Beverages19+3.8%+31.3%no analyst coverage
Diversified19+7.1%0.0%no analyst coverage
Petroleum Products19+10.4%+17.2%
2 / 2 / 0 of 4 covered
Telecommunication16+3.5%-17.2%no analyst coverage
Energy15-3.1%-26.1%
0 / 2 / 0 of 2 covered
Transport13-9.8%-0.8%
0 / 0 / 1 of 1 covered
Transport Services12-7.2%+33.8%no analyst coverage
Insurance11+4.5%+10.8%
2 / 3 / 1 of 6 covered
Aviation4+4.7%+186.7%
0 / 1 / 0 of 1 covered
Consumer Durables3+2.1%+50.0%no analyst coverage
Engineering Services20.0%-7.7%no analyst coverage
Diamond, Gems and Jewellery1+63.4%+17.3%no analyst coverage
Education1+5.6%-37.2%no analyst coverage
Trading1-4.3%+14.5%no analyst coverage
Steel1+0.3%-9.2%no analyst coverage
Media Entertainment & Publication1no analyst coverage
Cables1+78.0%+525.0%no analyst coverage
Printing & Stationery1+0.7%+15.7%no analyst coverage
Castings, Forgings & Fastners1-28.1%-1,150.0%no analyst coverage
Packaging1-2.1%-9.3%no analyst coverage

About Q2 FY26 sector data

Which sectors performed best in Q2 FY26?
On median profit growth, Transport Services led and Forest Materials lagged among sectors with at least ten companies reporting. The table below ranks every sector on median revenue and profit growth alongside its beat/miss split.
Why the median and not the average?
A single company swinging from a small loss to a small profit can produce a four-figure growth percentage, and an average would let that one row define the whole sector. The median describes the typical company in the group, which is the question a sector view is actually asked.
Why do sectors with few companies get excluded from the strongest and weakest?
A sector where three companies reported has a median that can move on one result. The strongest and weakest labels only consider sectors with ten or more reporters, so the ranking reflects a trend rather than an accident.
Why do some Q2 FY26 growth figures show "n/a" instead of a percentage?
Growth is left blank whenever the comparison period was not profitable. A percentage change measured from a loss is arithmetic without meaning — a swing from a ₹10 crore loss to a ₹10 crore profit is not "200% growth", and publishing it as such would flatter the company. The reported figures for both periods are still shown, so the change is there to read directly.
Does the beat/miss verdict cover every company?
No, and the denominator matters. An analyst consensus existed for 316 of the 6,036 companies that reported Q2 FY26 — 5.2%. Beat, missed and in-line describe only those. Every other company is marked "no estimate" rather than being counted as in line, because nobody forecast it. Revenue and profit growth, by contrast, cover every company in the table.
What counts as an in-line result rather than a beat or a miss?
Reported earnings per share within ±2% of the consensus estimate. The band is set there because a tighter one classifies rounding as news, and a wider one swallows surprises that genuinely moved a stock.
Are the figures consolidated or standalone?
Consolidated where a company reports on that basis, standalone otherwise, with all money in ₹ crore. Figures are as filed by the company with the exchanges (NSE/BSE); they are not restated or adjusted.

Figures are as reported by companies in their quarterly filings to the exchanges (NSE/BSE), in ₹ crore. Consolidated results are shown where a company reports them, otherwise standalone. Year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter growth is omitted where the comparison period was loss-making, since a percentage change from a negative base is not meaningful. Analyst consensus is an estimate, not a forecast of outcome.