Skip to content

Q2 FY26 Earnings Results

Q2 FY26 earnings, Jul–Sep 2025: 6,052 Indian listed companies have reported; median profit growth is +2.2% on last year, and 114 of 245 companies with analyst estimates beat them. Quarter ended 30 Sep 2025.

Strongest Food Products +22.2%

Weakest Forest Materials −33.3%

Most reporters Financial Services 599

median profit growth · strongest and weakest consider sectors with 10+ reporters

SectorReportedMedian sales YoYMedian profit YoYBeat / missed / in line
Financial Services599+1.2%−7.1%
3 / 5 / 3 of 11 covered
Industrial Products466+8.6%+10.6%
10 / 3 / 1 of 14 covered
Commercial Services404+6.7%−6.9%
0 / 3 / 1 of 4 covered
Consumer Goods366+7.4%+6.8%
12 / 17 / 2 of 31 covered
Textiles321+2.7%0.0%
2 / 2 / 0 of 4 covered
Chemicals313+7.8%+1.3%
2 / 6 / 1 of 9 covered
Information Technology310+12.8%+13.0%
5 / 2 / 3 of 10 covered
Capital Goods299+14.9%+9.5%
6 / 5 / 2 of 13 covered
Healthcare269+8.8%+6.4%
13 / 6 / 0 of 19 covered
Construction219+17.2%+16.5%
10 / 4 / 0 of 14 covered
Automobiles197+10.7%+9.5%
9 / 10 / 3 of 22 covered
Realty172+8.3%−12.9%
0 / 2 / 0 of 2 covered
Consumer Discretionary143+13.0%+15.6%
0 / 1 / 0 of 1 covered
FMCG120+16.1%0.0%
1 / 3 / 0 of 4 covered
Food Products120+15.9%+22.2%
4 / 1 / 0 of 5 covered
Media120+4.2%−9.8%
0 / 2 / 0 of 2 covered
Leisure Services114+7.0%−12.0%
2 / 3 / 1 of 6 covered
Industrials95+10.1%+5.2%no analyst coverage
Metals & Mining95+7.8%0.0%
1 / 1 / 2 of 4 covered
Logistics & Cargo87+8.2%0.0%
2 / 3 / 0 of 5 covered
Retail75+15.5%+14.0%
4 / 7 / 1 of 12 covered
Commodities72+11.1%+8.8%no analyst coverage
Services700.0%−15.4%no analyst coverage
Healthcare Services67+14.9%+14.9%
6 / 3 / 1 of 10 covered
Capital Markets64−1.3%−16.2%
3 / 0 / 1 of 4 covered
Forest Materials60+5.8%−33.3%no analyst coverage
Fast Moving Consumer Goods47−3.1%−9.2%no analyst coverage
Power44+10.3%−1.1%
4 / 3 / 0 of 7 covered
Telecom43+0.7%−19.4%
3 / 0 / 0 of 3 covered
Consumer Services42+9.5%+4.2%
1 / 0 / 0 of 1 covered
Banks39—+6.2%
2 / 1 / 1 of 4 covered
Utilities32+17.8%+12.5%no analyst coverage
Oil & Gas29+15.8%+8.3%
2 / 3 / 0 of 5 covered
Aerospace & Defense28+16.1%+17.7%
4 / 2 / 0 of 6 covered
Beverages25+2.8%+4.3%
1 / 0 / 1 of 2 covered
Petroleum Products22+10.6%+17.1%
0 / 2 / 0 of 2 covered
Diversified21+7.1%0.0%no analyst coverage
Transport Services17+6.3%−29.1%no analyst coverage
Insurance13+4.5%+3.0%
2 / 4 / 0 of 6 covered
Transport13−9.8%−0.8%no analyst coverage
Energy12−3.2%−29.1%
0 / 2 / 0 of 2 covered
Aviation5+2.3%+212.2%
0 / 1 / 0 of 1 covered
Telecommunication5+24.0%+33.3%no analyst coverage
Consumer Durables3+2.1%+50.0%no analyst coverage
Castings, Forgings & Fastners2−2.6%−599.6%no analyst coverage
Engineering Services20.0%−7.7%no analyst coverage
Trading2+41.1%+177.3%no analyst coverage
Steel1+0.3%−9.2%no analyst coverage
Capital Goods - Electrical Equipment1−46.7%−96.5%no analyst coverage
Telecomm Equipment & Infra Services1+106.8%+125.0%no analyst coverage
Printing & Stationery1+0.7%+15.7%no analyst coverage
Packaging1−2.1%−9.3%no analyst coverage
Education1+5.6%−37.2%no analyst coverage
Diamond, Gems and Jewellery1+63.4%+17.3%no analyst coverage
Media Entertainment & Publication1——no analyst coverage
Cables1+78.0%+525.0%no analyst coverage

About Q2 FY26 sector data

Which sectors performed best in Q2 FY26?
On median profit growth, Food Products led and Forest Materials lagged among sectors with at least ten companies reporting. The table below ranks every sector on median revenue and profit growth alongside its beat/miss split.
Why the median and not the average?
A single company swinging from a small loss to a small profit can produce a four-figure growth percentage, and an average would let that one row define the whole sector. The median describes the typical company in the group, which is the question a sector view is actually asked.
Why do sectors with few companies get excluded from the strongest and weakest?
A sector where three companies reported has a median that can move on one result. The strongest and weakest labels only consider sectors with ten or more reporters, so the ranking reflects a trend rather than an accident.
Why do some Q2 FY26 growth figures show "n/a" instead of a percentage?
Growth is left blank whenever the comparison period was not profitable. A percentage change measured from a loss is arithmetic without meaning — a swing from a ₹10 crore loss to a ₹10 crore profit is not "200% growth", and publishing it as such would flatter the company. The reported figures for both periods are still shown, so the change is there to read directly.
Does the beat/miss verdict cover every company?
No, and the denominator matters. An analyst consensus existed for 245 of the 6,052 companies that reported Q2 FY26 — 4.0%. Beat, missed and in-line describe only those. Every other company is marked "no estimate" rather than being counted as in line, because nobody forecast it. Revenue and profit growth, by contrast, cover every company in the table.
What counts as an in-line result rather than a beat or a miss?
Reported earnings per share within ±2% of the consensus estimate. The band is set there because a tighter one classifies rounding as news, and a wider one swallows surprises that genuinely moved a stock.
Are the figures consolidated or standalone?
Consolidated where a company reports on that basis, standalone otherwise, with all money in ₹ crore. Figures are as filed by the company with the exchanges (NSE/BSE); they are not restated or adjusted.

Figures are as reported by companies in their quarterly filings to the exchanges (NSE/BSE), in ₹ crore. Consolidated results are shown where a company reports them, otherwise standalone. Year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter growth is omitted where the comparison period was loss-making, since a percentage change from a negative base is not meaningful. Analyst consensus is an estimate, not a forecast of outcome.