Tapetide Score · formula v2.0.0
One number, and every step behind it.
The Tapetide Score rates every liquid Indian stock from 0 to 100 using six weighted pillars and a governance check, measured against a frozen, sector-relative reference. It is a fixed model over public data, so the same inputs always give the same score, and the whole method is open source.
How a score is built
Five steps, each feeding the next. The order matters: normalization happens before weighting, and the governance check happens after, so a red flag can never be averaged away by good ratios.
- 1
Who gets scored
Eligible universe: actively traded NSE/BSE stocks with sufficient price history.
- 2
Every metric on one scale
Each raw metric is winsorized then normalized against a versioned, sector-relative reference distribution.
- 3
Six pillars, weighted
Pillar sub-scores combine metrics evenly; the composite is a weighted sum across pillars.
- 4
Red flags pull down
A governance overlay can reduce the score and hard-cap severe red flags.
- 5
Held steady
Composite is smoothed and held in a small dead band to avoid day-to-day whipsaw.
Six pillars, weighted by evidence
Each pillar is the plain average of its metrics. The composite is the weighted sum below, renormalized over whichever pillars a stock has. The widths are the shipped weights, not approximations, and the colours are the ones the ranking uses for the same pillars.
Weights sum to 100
- Quality 22
- Return on capital and equity, margins, cash conversion. Positive on every out-of-sample test date.
- Valuation 24
- Earnings yield, P/E, P/B, EV/EBITDA, free-cash-flow and dividend yield against sector peers. Cheap plus fragile is treated as a trap, not a bargain.
- Growth 9
- Trailing-twelve-month sales growth only. Three-year growth rates predicted lower forward returns in testing, so they are no longer scored.
- Financial health 9
- Leverage, interest coverage and a distress score. Kept as a risk control; it did not predict returns on its own.
- Momentum 12
- Six-month return and distance from the 200-day average, on corporate-action-adjusted prices.
- Ownership 24
- Direction of promoter, FII and DII holding changes. The strongest pillar out of sample, which is why it carries the weight it does.
Governance overlay
Multiplies the composite. Never adds.Exchange surveillance flags, credit-rating downgrades, promoter pledges, heavy insider selling and audit qualifications each subtract from a multiplier that is floored at 0.5, so the overlay can at most halve a score. The most severe flags also hard-cap it: a stock under graded surveillance, or with more than three quarters of its promoter holding pledged, cannot score above 40 no matter how good its ratios are.
Reading the score
Scores concentrate in the middle of the 0-100 range: the observed all-time range is 12 to 76 and nothing has ever scored 80+. A 1-3 point gap between two stocks is inside the noise, so bands are the intended unit of comparison rather than exact rank.
Outlined: every score ever published falls between 12 and 76.Ticks: band cutoffs.
What the score is
- Data-driven, deterministic, reproducible — no LLM opinions.
- Same inputs always produce the same score (byte-stable, auditable).
- Standardized within a reference version: two stocks scored against the same frozen reference are directly comparable, and re-running the same inputs reproduces the same number exactly.
- Sector-relative: a bank and an FMCG company are scored fairly against their own sector's history, not against each other directly.
- Red flags can pull the score down, never average up into a positive number.
What it is not
- Not investment advice. Decision-support only.
- A high score is not a forecast — it summarizes past + current evidence on traded liquidity, fundamentals, ownership and governance.
- Fundamental inputs are the latest reported figures, not the figures as they stood on a past date. A historical score therefore reflects later restatements, so the score history is best read as a trend rather than as a replayable point-in-time backtest.
- Scores are comparable within a reference version. The reference is frozen and versioned, but it is calibrated from one day's cross-section, so comparisons across different reference versions are approximate.
- The governance overlay is built from published regulatory and exchange disclosures. Those records begin partway through our history, so the penalties and caps are grounded in disclosed facts but have not yet been validated against a full market cycle.
- Eligibility requires enough traded days and enough populated metrics. Thinly traded stocks are deliberately left unscored rather than scored on sparse data.
When it changes
- Cadence
- Once per trading day.
- Timing
- Recomputed each evening after that day's market data and fundamentals are consolidated, typically around 19:45 IST.
- Coverage
- Roughly 4,500 stocks are scored per run — every actively traded, sufficiently liquid NSE/BSE stock that clears the eligibility gate.
- Score date
- A score is stamped with the latest completed TRADING date, so weekends and market holidays reuse the previous session's score rather than inventing one.
- Stability
- Scores are smoothed and held within a small dead band, so a typical day moves the average stock by well under a point. Large single-day jumps indicate a real change in the inputs or a new red flag, not noise.
- If a run fails
- A run that sees materially less than the recent norm is refused rather than published, and rankings fall back to the last complete day. A truncated run can never be served as a full picture.
Questions people ask
What is the Tapetide Score?
Why is Ownership weighted as much as Valuation?
Why is Growth only 9 points?
Does a high score mean I should buy?
Why do scores cluster between 40 and 65?
How is a bank compared with a manufacturer?
Why does a stock show “Insufficient data”?
How often is it updated?
Where is the full calculation?
Tapetide is not a SEBI-registered research analyst or investment adviser. Consult a qualified advisor before investing.